Switch to ADA Accessible Theme Close Menu
Florida Personal Injury Lawyers
$3,830,000

Catastrophic motorcycle accident resulted in a jury verdict.

$1,748,000

Auto accident, multi-car crash

$1,035,000

Auto accident involving defective airbag

$600,000

Death resulting from hospital turning away patient

$550,000

Auto accident involving tractor trailer

$345,000

Auto accident involving a work vehicle

$340,000

Slip and fall at a hotel bathroom

$115,000

Auto accident involving pedestrian. $115,000 in litigation instead of $15k presuit offer

Call: 844-200-0000
Free Initial Consultation
Do you opt in to being contacted via SMS texting or phone call?
 
protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms

Understanding the “Assumption of Risk” Doctrine

Liab2

Some activities, like football and other contact sports, are inherently dangerous. If you sustain an injury while participating in an inherently dangerous activity it’s difficult to bring a successful personal injury lawsuit. For example, if you are injured while playing football a personal injury lawsuit against the defensive end who tackled you and broke your leg likely won’t succeed.

This situation falls under the “assumption of the risk” doctrine.

What Is Assumption of Risk?

Under the “assumption of the risk” doctrine, courts limit liability in cases where injured plaintiffs knew the risks of a dangerous activity. A plaintiff who “assumed” the risk can’t necessarily blame anyone else for his injury. In other words, if you sue an allegedly negligent actor for damages, the defendant can say, yes, the plaintiff sustained an injury, but the plaintiff knew what he was getting himself into. If the court agrees that the plaintiff assumed the risk then the defendant can often avoid liability.

But Florida law only applies the assumption of the risk doctrine under limited circumstances. Contact sport injuries are a prime example. While there are situations in which a party injured while playing contact sports can successfully sue for damages, in most cases courts will find that the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury.

The assumption of risk doctrine also applies to express contracts not to sue. One of the situations in which this rule applies might surprise you.

There’s No Suing in Baseball

Have you ever read the fine print on a ticket to a major league baseball game? It comes with a disclaimer that says the ticket holder assumes the risks and dangers incidental to baseball.

According to a 2014 Bloomberg article, more than 1,700 baseball fans are injured every year — usually by foul balls and splintered bats. Some of those injuries are serious, requiring surgery and months of recovery. Baseball fans know to watch out for foul balls and broken bats, but sometimes it’s impossible to get out of the way in time. Even still, courts have held that baseball teams only have a limited duty to protect fans. People sitting in the “danger zone” (near home plate) are protected by netting, but that doesn’t help a fan sitting along the third base line.

In fact, a fan who was badly injured by a foul ball at Yankee Stadium in 2011 sued for compensation, but a New York court ruled that he assumed the risk of injury. Some ballparks are considering adding more protective netting, but that won’t help injured fans win their personal injury lawsuits.

Contact Us Today

Contact a Jacksonville personal injury attorney at The Pendas Law Firm today for a free consultation if you were injured by someone else’s negligence. Our experienced attorneys know how to combat defensive tactics like the assumption of risk doctrine. We will help you recover compensation for your injuries, including medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

The Pendas Law Firm also represents clients in the Fort Lauderdale, Tampa, Orlando, Fort Myers, Miami, West Palm Beach, Daytona Beach and Bradenton areas.

Resources:

insurancejournal.com/news/national/2017/05/12/450863.htm

si.com/mlb/2017/09/21/new-york-yankees-netting-ballpark-injury

Read What Others Have To Say About Us

  • “I can’t express how much I appreciate this law firm. I had the honor to deal with attorney Daniel. He kept me updated on my case. I couldn’t ask for a better law firm. Daniel fought for me til the end and got me what I deserved. Thanks Daniel and your team for always being there to answer any of my questions. If I ever need a law firm again...”

    Terry Mcphillips
  • “Speedy & superb handling of clients & cases, kind & caring. Highly recommended professionals. They made everything very easy for us, were outgoing & polite. I would call them again if ever in need, rather than call the larger firms that need to advertise & brag about winnings…Pendas was a pleasant & more personal approach instead of...”

    Joseph Kestell
  • “Wow I called Pendas Law Firm the other day at their main intake line it was around 11 o’clock at night and I’ve got this wonderful representative his name was Jeffrey Alvarez. This guy was very professional and his compassion was out of this world I don’t know what I would do if I could not have got a hold of him...”

    Luis Sanchez
  • “Thank you for helping us in our time of need. This firm handled my father’s workers comp case, and helped us with every question we had, and we had a plenty. Thankful for the entire legal team!”

    Enilno Resu
  • “I just concluded a case with attorney Michael Sanchez and paralegal Camilo Lopez. I can only say they are exceptional. The customer service is unique, they have been battling alongside me since day 1. They are not only courteous and professional, but they also are amazing at their job. Thanks to them I got a great deal. I am glad I decided to use their services...”

    Israel Garcia
  • “Their attorneys are absolutely someone you want handling your car accident claim. They communicated with us promptly and thoroughly. I was very happy with our recovery. Already recommended them to others in the same circumstances, their staff speaks Spanish and you feel like in family.”

    Ian Brito
  • “Very Professional law firm. They explained to you every detail what to do according to the laws (worker’s compensation). Mr. Danilo Cruz is the best Lawyer and his team. They are very kind, friendly, responsible, I love this firm. They fight for their clients. AwesomeTeam!”

    Lau Rod