Switch to ADA Accessible Theme Close Menu


A constant source of help for your family in times of need, we’re available 24/7 in person, by phone and video conference. Call us anytime for an always free consultation.

Free Initial Consultation
protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms

Proving a Causal Link Between Whistleblowing and Your Termination


Believe it or not, one of the first major instances of whistleblowing occurred way back before major corporations and billion dollar deals were even a thing, in 1773. Benjamin Franklin exposed confidential letters that proved that the governor of Massachusetts misled Parliament to promote a military buildup in the new world. The governor was relieved of his duties and exiled.

Not too long afterwards, in 1777, two US naval officers revealed the torture of British POWs by the Continental Navy. The former commander of the US Navy retaliated against the two whistleblowers. As a result, in 1778, the Continental Congress enacted the first whistleblower protection law.

Today, whistleblower protection laws have greatly evolved with each new case of whistleblowing retaliation, but the premise of the law remains the same: to prevent retaliation against an employee who reports any violations of the law on the part of a public employer or independent contractor.

Proving a Causal Link Between Your Disclosure and Your Termination, Discipline, Or Unfair Treatment

In order to prove that your employer acted out of retaliation, you must be able to show a direct link between your unfair treatment and your full disclosure. One way to do this is to provide direct evidence of a retaliatory motive.

Direct evidence is a hard piece of evidence that explicitly states the employer’s intentions, such as an email that informs another individual within the company that, “Jessica’s report has opened a whole new can of worms for us. We need to get rid of her before she reveals what is really going on.” Unfortunately, direct evidence is hard to come by.

Circumstantial evidence, on the other hand, is also helpful. Circumstantial evidence would be something much less obvious, and therefore, something a little more difficult to prove, such as a verbal comment along the lines of “Jessica’s budget analysis has raised a lot of suspicion and put us under direct fire,” made by the Vice President to the President and overheard by the secretary. Circumstantial evidence is helpful in that it establishes hostility and motive.

Another way to prove that there is a link between your filing of a whistleblower report and the employer’s unfair treatment towards you is to establish temporal proximity.

Temporal proximity is the time period between the whistleblower reporting and the adverse actions taken by the employer. Based off of previous rulings, periods ranging from 12 days to one month after a whistleblowing report is filed is considered “very close” in time. The courts are likely to find that an employer who takes adverse action within this time period is guilty of acting out of retaliation. However, anything beyond the one month period becomes much more more gray, and it can become extremely difficult for an individual to win a whistleblower retaliation claim as temporal proximity becomes a longer stretch of time.

Consult a Fort Myers Whistleblower Claims Lawyer

At The Pendas Law Firm, our Fort Myers lawyers can help you understand your rights under the Whistleblower Protection Act, as well as any applicable state laws. Contact our whistleblower claims lawyers today for a free case evaluation. We can help you determine the strength of your case and present the available evidence in such a way that will prove your employer guilty of retaliation. Call us at 1-888-LPENDAS today to get started.



Read What Others Have To Say About Us

  • “I'm very happy with this firm... Joel is an excellent attorney and Carolyn is an amazing paralegal, After been ditched from another law firm, Pendas took care of me and they won my case. I recommend them 100%...” - Jacksonville -

    Maria Pastor
  • “This law firm is amazing. I love how they always try to stay/keep in contact with you. It shows that they really care and want everything taken care of correctly, Thank You!...” - Orlando -

    Shantelle Blackwell
  • “I'm very thankful for all the attention of all the Pendas staff that took care of my case and helped me through the process, thanks for your patience, collaboration and comprehension!...” - Tampa -

    Carlos Guadalupe
  • “The Pendas Law Firm was amazing! They are very kind, professional, and hard-working! They always kept me informed. Larry Trias was great to work with! I always recommend Pendas to family and friends. Thank you for helping me with my case!” - Fort Myers -

    Heather Pepper
  • “Their attorneys are absolutely someone you want handling your car accident claim. They communicated with us promptly and thoroughly. I was very happy with our recovery. Their staff speaks Spanish and you feel like family.” - Orlando -

    Ian Brito
  • “I would definitely recommend this firm. The staff really helps you and they actually show you that they care, especially Siomara Roldan. She has been a great help for my family and myself, she is always helpful with any questions.” - Tampa -

    Wilmer D Santana Rodriguez
  • “5 stars for these guys! Hays Mathis got my case settled without going to court for a sum that dwarfed what the other guys were advising me to take. I highly recommend Hays not only because he does the work to get it done but he cares about the client and outcome as well!” - Jacksonville -

    Mike Reilly
  • “Pendas is the best! The paralegals are very attentive to your case, knowledgeable, and communicative! The attorney also won’t just be there the day of your sign up, but all throughout the process as needed. I truly recommend Pendas!” - Orlando -

    Ben Fitzgerald