Switch to ADA Accessible Theme Close Menu
Florida Personal Injury Lawyers
$3,830,000

Catastrophic motorcycle accident resulted in a jury verdict.

$1,748,000

Auto accident, multi-car crash

$1,035,000

Auto accident involving defective airbag

$600,000

Death resulting from hospital turning away patient

$550,000

Auto accident involving tractor trailer

$345,000

Auto accident involving a work vehicle

$340,000

Slip and fall at a hotel bathroom

$115,000

Auto accident involving pedestrian. $115,000 in litigation instead of $15k presuit offer

Call: 844-200-0000
Free Initial Consultation
Do you opt in to being contacted via SMS texting or phone call?
 
protected by reCAPTCHA Privacy - Terms

St. Petersburg Considering Replacement of Firefighter Helmets

Before becoming the mayor of St. Petersburg, Rick Kriseman was an attorney who represented firefighters that were injured by faulty and defective helmets. Now as mayor, he is considering the replacement of all firefighting headgear for the city’s firefighters. This comes in the wake of multiple product liability cases alleging that the current helmets caused serious injury to St. Petersburg firefighters.

Replacing the Helmets

The current model of helmet used by the St. Petersburg firefighters is a 1044 Cairns model. The city switched to this model of helmet in 2010 when it changed from the “Philadelphia style” to the “New York City style” of helmet. If all 313 helmets were replaced for the city, it would cost $60,000; however, city officials are hopeful that if purchased in bulk the city may be able to save some money. Mayor Kriseman has stated that he also wants to purchase the new helmets “out of an abundance of caution” and because he wants his city’s firefighters to have the best possible equipment.

Product Liability Lawsuits Pending

Currently, there are five product liability lawsuits pending by active and retired firefighters of St. Petersburg who claim that the defective helmets caused serious neck injuries. They filed their lawsuits in Pinellas-Pasco County Court with the claims that the city-issued helmets had design flaws that led to their injuries. According to the lawsuits, the helmets are unbalanced and as a result cause neck and back injuries when worn.

The firefighters were referred to as “bobbleheads” in lawsuits for the head and neck movements that the helmets cause. One former firefighter directly attributes his retirement to the faulty helmets, stating “I had to retire because of the helmet. I’ve been basically homebound for two years.” He was the first of five firefighters to raise issues regarding the defective nature of the helmets. This firefighter filed a workers’ compensation lawsuit against the city, as well, which has yet to be resolved.

All five firefighters have filed lawsuits against the manufacturer of the helmet, Mine Safety Appliance, in addition to the distributor, Ten-8 Fire Equipment, Inc. Since the filing of the lawsuits by St. Petersburg firefighters, other fire departments across the state and country that use this particular type of helmet are looking into claims. This has the potential to turn into a massive class action lawsuit if these product liability claims can be substantiated.

Florida Product Liability Law

In Florida, product liability lawsuits are governed and defined by state law. Fla. Stat. 768.81 defines a products liability case as a claim that a person was injured because of the manufacture, construction, design, formulation, installation, preparation, or assembly of a product based on strict liability, negligence, breach of warranty, nuisance, or other legal theory. The injured person must prove that were it not for the defective product, they would not have sustained their damages.

Florida law also imposes strict deadlines for the filing of a product liability case. Under Fla. Stat. 95.031, a product liability lawsuit must be filed in court within four years from the time when the injury is or should have been discovered. In addition, the law provides that a product liability lawsuit cannot be filed in cases where a person was injured by a product that has a useful life of ten years or less if the product has been used for twelve years or more, which is known as the repose period.

A person can also bring a claim of product liability if the injuries caused in an accident were enhanced because of the faulty product. An example of this type of case would be when a person sues an airbag manufacturer because the airbag did not deploy after a car accident. In both types of cases, Florida law uses comparative and contributory fault to determine the proper amount of damages.

Florida Fault Rules

For product liability cases and other claims of negligence, Florida applies a comparative fault rule to determine the proper amount of damages in a case. This rule applies to all economic and non-economic damages in the case, including past and future lost income, medical and funeral expenses, lost support and services, personal property, emotional distress, pain and suffering, and any other costs that are reasonably related to the product liability case.

In order to apply the comparative fault rule, a judge or jury will first determine the total amount of damages in the case. Then, they will apportion a percentage of damages to each party involved. The injured party will receive the percentage of damages that they were deemed to have not caused in the accident. For example, if the total damage in a product liability case is $100,000 and the injured party was found to be twenty percent at fault, then they would receive $80,000 in compensation.

Defenses to Product Liability Claims

Typically, there are a few standard defenses that manufacturers and distributors will try to use to get out of product liability lawsuits. One common defense is product misuse – where the claim is that the person who was injured misused the product in some way or used the product in a way that is unexpected. Another common defense is that the injured person altered the product before the injury was caused. However, the alteration must be substantial, such as removing a safety guard near a blade. Finally, the defendants in a product liability case may claim that the product was not defective when it left the control of their hands.

Contact Our Office Today

You never expect to be hurt by the products that you own, especially when it is safety equipment. If you or someone that you know has been injured in a product liability case in Orlando, Tampa, Fort Myers, Jacksonville, or West Palm Beach the experienced attorneys at The Pendas Law Firm are here to help you with your legal needs. Call or contact the office today for a free and confidential consultation of your case.

Read What Others Have To Say About Us

  • “I can’t express how much I appreciate this law firm. I had the honor to deal with attorney Daniel. He kept me updated on my case. I couldn’t ask for a better law firm. Daniel fought for me til the end and got me what I deserved. Thanks Daniel and your team for always being there to answer any of my questions. If I ever need a law firm again...”

    Terry Mcphillips
  • “Speedy & superb handling of clients & cases, kind & caring. Highly recommended professionals. They made everything very easy for us, were outgoing & polite. I would call them again if ever in need, rather than call the larger firms that need to advertise & brag about winnings…Pendas was a pleasant & more personal approach instead of...”

    Joseph Kestell
  • “Wow I called Pendas Law Firm the other day at their main intake line it was around 11 o’clock at night and I’ve got this wonderful representative his name was Jeffrey Alvarez. This guy was very professional and his compassion was out of this world I don’t know what I would do if I could not have got a hold of him...”

    Luis Sanchez
  • “Thank you for helping us in our time of need. This firm handled my father’s workers comp case, and helped us with every question we had, and we had a plenty. Thankful for the entire legal team!”

    Enilno Resu
  • “I just concluded a case with attorney Michael Sanchez and paralegal Camilo Lopez. I can only say they are exceptional. The customer service is unique, they have been battling alongside me since day 1. They are not only courteous and professional, but they also are amazing at their job. Thanks to them I got a great deal. I am glad I decided to use their services...”

    Israel Garcia
  • “Their attorneys are absolutely someone you want handling your car accident claim. They communicated with us promptly and thoroughly. I was very happy with our recovery. Already recommended them to others in the same circumstances, their staff speaks Spanish and you feel like in family.”

    Ian Brito
  • “Very Professional law firm. They explained to you every detail what to do according to the laws (worker’s compensation). Mr. Danilo Cruz is the best Lawyer and his team. They are very kind, friendly, responsible, I love this firm. They fight for their clients. AwesomeTeam!”

    Lau Rod